<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Words you&#8217;re probably using wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jasoncrawford.org/2010/05/words-youre-probably-using-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jasoncrawford.org/2010/05/words-youre-probably-using-wrong/</link>
	<description>A tech/business geek in San Francisco</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 04:29:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Salzman</title>
		<link>http://jasoncrawford.org/2010/05/words-youre-probably-using-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Salzman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 00:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasoncrawford.org/?p=277#comment-278</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Jason.  During the past 18 months I have said that I&#039;ve been managing a a change to the business model of my company.  True, but not precise. The article on pivot was good--and makes it clear that what I was aiming for (and have largely accomplished) is a pivot on the customer segment.  Maintaining solvency while shifting the company&#039;s orientation toward a new type of customer (enterpreise and B2B from consumer) demanded that we stay grounded in what we already knew and that has been a standard by which I have decided on the changes I&#039;ve made.  In my case, it wasn&#039;t a startup that needed to pivot--it was a 10 year old company whose customer segment was rapidly (very rapidly) shifting to Skype and other VoIP solutions for international telecom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Jason.  During the past 18 months I have said that I&#39;ve been managing a a change to the business model of my company.  True, but not precise. The article on pivot was good&#8211;and makes it clear that what I was aiming for (and have largely accomplished) is a pivot on the customer segment.  Maintaining solvency while shifting the company&#39;s orientation toward a new type of customer (enterpreise and B2B from consumer) demanded that we stay grounded in what we already knew and that has been a standard by which I have decided on the changes I&#39;ve made.  In my case, it wasn&#39;t a startup that needed to pivot&#8211;it was a 10 year old company whose customer segment was rapidly (very rapidly) shifting to Skype and other VoIP solutions for international telecom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jasoncrawford</title>
		<link>http://jasoncrawford.org/2010/05/words-youre-probably-using-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>jasoncrawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 20:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasoncrawford.org/?p=277#comment-274</guid>
		<description>Ha, good point!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, good point!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveJ</title>
		<link>http://jasoncrawford.org/2010/05/words-youre-probably-using-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 18:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasoncrawford.org/?p=277#comment-273</guid>
		<description>Here is a rule of thumb: any word that VCs start to use regularly with positive connotations, quickly becomes mis-used because entrepreneurs want to position their companies to meet VC demand (whether or not the use of the word is correct).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a rule of thumb: any word that VCs start to use regularly with positive connotations, quickly becomes mis-used because entrepreneurs want to position their companies to meet VC demand (whether or not the use of the word is correct).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jasoncrawford</title>
		<link>http://jasoncrawford.org/2010/05/words-youre-probably-using-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>jasoncrawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 10:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasoncrawford.org/?p=277#comment-272</guid>
		<description>I agree, both on the cause and the solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, both on the cause and the solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Crawford</title>
		<link>http://jasoncrawford.org/2010/05/words-youre-probably-using-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>David Crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 08:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasoncrawford.org/?p=277#comment-271</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s easy to do this if you use terms like these after hearing them in a conversation.  You guess the meaning from context, then adopt it into your vocabulary.  So a good lesson to learn from this post is if you find yourself using words and you don&#039;t know how you learned them, go to the source!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s easy to do this if you use terms like these after hearing them in a conversation.  You guess the meaning from context, then adopt it into your vocabulary.  So a good lesson to learn from this post is if you find yourself using words and you don&#39;t know how you learned them, go to the source!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ram</title>
		<link>http://jasoncrawford.org/2010/05/words-youre-probably-using-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>ram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 06:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasoncrawford.org/?p=277#comment-266</guid>
		<description>The title should be &quot;Concepts frequently used incorrectly&quot;. Precise employment of semantics, grammar and spelling minimizes the potential for confusion and the need for caveats and clarification.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The title should be &#8220;Concepts frequently used incorrectly&#8221;. Precise employment of semantics, grammar and spelling minimizes the potential for confusion and the need for caveats and clarification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jasoncrawford</title>
		<link>http://jasoncrawford.org/2010/05/words-youre-probably-using-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>jasoncrawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 03:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasoncrawford.org/?p=277#comment-265</guid>
		<description>And before anyone else mentions it, I&#039;ll say that technically I should have said &quot;wrongly&quot; or &quot;incorrectly&quot; in the title. I&#039;m more of a stickler for precise use of concepts than for precision in grammar, when there&#039;s no potential for confusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And before anyone else mentions it, I&#39;ll say that technically I should have said &#8220;wrongly&#8221; or &#8220;incorrectly&#8221; in the title. I&#39;m more of a stickler for precise use of concepts than for precision in grammar, when there&#39;s no potential for confusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

